Lucretia Mott Abolitionist and Womens Rights Activist

Lucretia Mott, a Quaker reformer and minister, was an abolitionist and womens rights activist.  She helped initiate the  Seneca Falls Womans Rights Convention with Elizabeth Cady Stanton  in 1848. She believed in human equality as a right granted by God. Early Life Lucretia Mott was born Lucretia Coffin on January 3, 1793. Her father was Thomas Coffin, a sea captain, and her mother was Anna Folger.  Martha Coffin Wright was her sister. She was raised in a Quaker (Society of Friends) community in Massachusetts, thoroughly imbued with womens rights (in her words). Her father was often away at sea, and she helped her mother with the boarding house when her father was gone.  When she was thirteen she started school, and when she finished at the school, she came back as an assistant teacher.  She taught for four years, then moved to Philadelphia, returning home to her family. She married James Mott, and after their first child died at age 5, became more involved in her Quaker religion. By 1818 she was serving as a minister. She and her husband followed Elias Hicks in the Great Separation of 1827, opposing the more evangelical and orthodox branch. Anti-Slavery Commitment Like many Hicksite Quakers including Hicks, Lucretia Mott considered slavery an evil to be opposed. They refused to use cotton cloth, cane sugar, and other slavery-produced goods. With her skills in ministry she began to make public speeches for abolition. From her home in Philadelphia, she began to travel, usually accompanied by her husband who supported her activism. They often sheltered runaway slaves in their home. In America Lucretia Mott helped organize womens abolitionist societies, since the anti-slavery organizations would not admit women as members. In 1840, she was selected as a delegate to the Worlds Anti-Slavery Convention in London, which she found controlled by anti-slavery factions opposed to public speaking and action by women. Elizabeth Cady Stanton later credited conversations with Lucretia Mott, while seated in the segregated womens section, with the idea of the holding a mass meeting to address womens rights. Seneca Falls It was not until 1848, however, before Lucretia Mott and Stanton and others (including Lucretia Motts sister, Martha Coffin Wright) could bring together a local womens rights convention in Seneca Falls. The Declaration of Sentiments written primarily by Stanton and Mott was a deliberate parallel to the Declaration of Independence: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men and women are created equal. Lucretia Mott was a key organizer in the broader-based convention for womens rights held in Rochester, New York, in 1850, at the Unitarian Church. Lucretia Motts theology was influenced by Unitarians including Theodore Parker and William Ellery Channing as well as early Quakers including William Penn. She taught that the kingdom of God is within man (1849) and was part of the group of religious liberals who formed the Free Religious Association. Elected as the first president of the American Equal Rights Convention after the end of the Civil War, Lucretia Mott strove a few years later to reconcile the two factions that split over the priorities between woman suffrage and black male suffrage. She continued her involvement in causes for peace and equality through her later years. Lucretia Mott died on November 11, 1880, twelve years after her husbands death. Lucretia Mott Writings Memo on SelfA compilation of autobiographical material from Lucretia Mott. Linking pages appear to be missing from the site.Likeness to ChristMotts sermon of September 30, 1849. Provided by Chris Faatz -- the Mott biography that used to accompany this is unavailable.On John BrownAn excerpt from a talk by Mott on the abolitionist John Brown: a pacifist need not be passivist.Bryant, Jennifer. Lucretia Mott: A Guiding Light, Women of Spirit Series. Trade Paperback 1996. Hardcover 1996.  Davis, Lucile. Lucretia Mott, Read--Discover Biographies. Hardcover 1998. .Sterling, Dorothy. Lucretia Mott. Trade Paperback 1999. ISBN 155861217. Selected Lucretia Mott Quotations If our principles are right, why should we be cowards?The world has never yet seen a truly great and virtuous nation, because in the degradation of women, the very fountains of life are poisoned at their source.I have no idea of submitting tamely to injustice inflicted either on me or on the slave. I will oppose it with all the moral powers with which I am endowed. I am no advocate of passivity.Let her [woman] receive encouragement for the proper cultivation of all her powers, so that she may enter profitably into the active business of life.Liberty is not less a blessing, because oppression has so long darkened the mind that it can not appreciate it.I grew up so thoroughly imbued with womens rights that it was the most important question of my life from a very early day.My conviction led me to adhere to the sufficiency of the light within us, resting on truth for authority, not on authority for truth.We too often bind ourselves by authorities rather than by the truth.It is time that Christians were judged more by their likeness to Christ than their notions of Christ. Were this sentiment generally admitted we should not see such tenacious adherence to what men deem the opinions and doctrines of Christ while at the same time in every day practise is exhibited anything but a likeness to Christ.It is not Christianity, but priestcraft that has subjected woman as we find her.The cause of Peace has had my share of efforts, taking the ultra non-resistance ground -- that a Christian cannot consistently uphold, and actively support, a government based on the sword, or whose ultimate resort is to the destroying weapons. Quotes About Lucretia Mott Ralph Waldo Emerson about Lucretia Motts antislavery activism:  She brings domesticity and common sense, and that propriety which every man loves, directly into this hurly-burly, and makes every bully ashamed. Her courage is no merit, one almost says, where triumph is so sure.Elizabeth Cady Stanton  about Lucretia Mott:  Having known Lucretia Mott, not only in the flush of life, when all her faculties were at their zenith, but in the repose of advanced age, her withdrawal from our midst seems as natural and as beautiful as the changing foliage of some grand oak from the spring-time to the autumn. Facts About Lucretia Mott Occupation:  reformer: antislavery and womens rights activist; Quaker ministerDates:  January 3, 1793 - November 11, 1880Also known as:  Lucretia Coffin Mott

Harvey s The Beautiful Bones And Profile A Serial Killer

In the sick minds of those who murder again and again, rape, pain and death are twisted into a passion to kill. Otherwise known as an ordinary individual, serial killers turn to violence and death in search of power over others, and to explore their fatal addiction to their immoral thrills. Even though these horrific crimes of a serial killer repulse most individuals, there is still a strange fascination when it comes to these deadly killers. I chose the movie The Lovely Bones to profile a serial killer. In the movie we do not really get a background of Mr. Harvey childhood, but in the book we find out that Mr. Harvey’s mother was a desperate woman who taught Harvey to shoplift and even rob victims. His father has an abusive personality†¦show more content†¦During the middle of the night, he goes out to the cornfield and begins digging a hole in the field for his plan. He picks the cornfield, knowing not only does it seem deserted throughout the day, but also that Susie takes this path everyday to go home. Once Mr. Harvey is done building is underground shack, he begins to go along with his plans of luring Susie inside. After school on December 6, 1973, Susie begins to walk home when she runs into Mr. Harvey. Mr. Harvey begins telling her that he has built something and would like her opinion of this. She denies at first, he does not try and force her, but casually tries to get her interested in something he built. As he begins to walk away he says that he will show t he other kids in the neighborhood what he had built and that they would be excited. Susie then agrees to go with Mr. Harvey, he shows her the clubhouse that he built for the neighborhood kids but in reality he built it for her. Once Susie and Mr. Harvey go down the ladder in the underground shack, the shack is filled with things that grab her attention. He begins to try and make her feel comfortable and then slowly begins to make his moves. His laugh in this scene of the movie is creepy and in a way gives you chills. He touches the top of Susie’s hat, takes his coat off because it feels warm, and then sits across from her. He begins to tell her that she

Embodiment and Free Indirect Discourse Reliance Essay Example For Students

Embodiment and Free Indirect Discourse: Reliance   Essay Mrs. Dalloway is the ultimate form of free indirect discourse. Virginia Woolf employs this literary technique to allow the reader a chance to truly delve into the characters’ thoughts. Through this mechanism, character development happens not only through the lens of an omniscient third party but also through the characters’ own lenses and the perspectives of other characters. With free indirect discourse, the characters of this novel become much more than just personages in a novel about the events of a single day. In fact, the technique gives rise to some characters coming to embody certain prevalent themes in the novel. The implementation of embodiment is essential because it allows Woolf to comment on certain social themes from all angles, giving new meaning to complex themes such as human nature and love and religion. The structural technique of free indirect discourse is critical to the characters’ abilities to embody themes, which gives theme a deeper and more pernicious meaning throughout the novel. Embodiment in the novel extends much deeper than a character simply symbolizing a theme, it allows characters to become destructive themes. Dr. Holmes becomes the embodiment of human nature. During his session with Dr. Holmes Septimus thinks of the doctor and human nature as â€Å"the brute with red nostrils† (93). The connotation of the word â€Å"brute† suggests that human nature is inherently evil. In fact Septimus, views human nature, and subsequently Dr. Holmes, as responsible for â€Å"the sin for which human nature had condemned him to death; that he did not feel† (91). What deepens the theme is the fact that Dr. Holmes is completely unaware of his embodiment. He even states that he has â€Å"come as a friend† right before Septimus kills himself (149). In actuality, his arrival triggered Septimus’s final downfall. The doctor’s inability to realize his own embodiment mirrors Septimus’s frustration with his own inability to feel, adding dimension to the theme. Similarly, Miss Kilman becomes the embodiment of love and religion. Even when â€Å"the body of Miss Kilman was not before her , it overwhelmed her – the idea† (126). In this case, the embodiment is much more literal: the flesh of Miss Kilman becomes the theme. Miss Kilman, unlike Dr. Holmes, acknowledges the embodiment herself when she thinks, â€Å"it is the flesh that she must control† (128). Clarissa feels that love and religion destroy â€Å"privacy of the soul†, something she greatly values (127). On a more tangible level, Miss Kilman physically takes Elizabeth, who she greatly loves, away from Clarissa. The embodiment throughout the novel gives light to the destructive nature of certain themes. However, this embodiment would not be possible without free indirect discourse. Free indirect discourse is the backbone that allows embodiment to flourish. The technique allows for the reader to enter Septimus’s mind to understand the gravity of the distress human nature causes him. He feels that â€Å"human nature, in short, was on him†¦Holmes was on him† (92). Switching to Rezia’s point of view, suddenly Dr. Holmes â€Å"only wanted to help them† (92). However, this thought contrasts greatly with the moment Rezia finally realizes Holmes causes some sort of distress in Septimus she tries to prevent him from seeing her husband right before Septimus kills himself. The novel is never told from Dr. Holmes’s point of view, which highlights Septimus’s lack of understanding in his inability to feel. Septimus spirals downhill when human literally encroaches on his brief moment of lucidity: Holmes entering his home. Clarissa sees love and religion as â€Å"the cruelest things in the world†¦clumsy, hot, domineering†¦ dressed in a mackintosh coat† (126). Through Clarissa’s thought, the reader is able to truly understand that Kilman has destroyed what Clarissa cherishes most. By switching to Miss Kilman’s narration the embodiment becomes much deeper. Kilman acknowledges that â€Å"she had got Elizabeth†, a fact that she knows Clarissa resents (129). Miss Kilman then tries â€Å"to think of something else† to bother Clarissa with, further highlighting the destructive nature of the embodiment (129). While Dr. Holmes’s oblivion to his embodiment strengthens it, Miss Kilman’s tactical awareness strengthens her embodiment. This major difference is made apparent only through narration, or in Holmes’s case, lack thereof. Without free indirect discourse, characters would not be able to embody themes. .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849 , .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849 .postImageUrl , .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849 , .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849:hover , .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849:visited , .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849:active { border:0!important; } .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849:active , .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849 .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u85a67bb2a8f45712ed04dd71e4c05849:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Nature of Quantitative Research EssayThroughout the novel, theme becomes much more apparent through the technique of free indirect discourse. The characters of the novel come to embody, physically become, themes that reek havoc on other characters’ lives. Dr. Holmes and human nature push Septimus to his demise. Miss Kilman and love and religion manage to strip Clarissa of her true values. The narration style of the novel is essential to understanding the idea of embodiment. Undoubtedly, free indirect discourse in this novel highlights the deleterious nature of human nature and love and religion. The condemnation of the themes leads one to wonder, is this part of a larger social commentary that Woolf is attempting to make? Do aspects of human behavior inherently have perverse affects on humans themselves?

Joan Of Arc Essays (1974 words) - , Term Papers

Joan Of Arc The historical novel is one of those flexible inventions which can he fitted to the mood or genius of any writer, and can be either story or history in the proportion he prefers. Walter Scott, who contrived it, tested its elasticity as fully as any of the long line of romancers who have followed him in every land and language. It has been a favorite form with readers from the first, and it will be to the last, because it gives them the feeling that to read so much about people who once lived and figured in human events is not such a waste of time as to read of people who never lived at all, or figured in anything but the author's fancy. With a race like ours, which always desires a reason, or at least an excuse, for enjoying itself, this feeling no doubt availed much for fiction, and helped to decide the fate of the novel favorably when its popularity was threatened by the good, stupid Anglo-Saxon conscience. Probably it had the largest share in establishing fiction as a respectable literary form, and in giving it the primacy which it now enjoys. Without the success of the monstrous fables which the gentle Sir Walter palmed off upon his generation in the shape of historical fiction, we should hardly have revered as masters in a beautiful art the writers who have since swayed our emotions. Jane Austen, Miss Edgeworth, Hawthorne, Thackeray, George Eliot, Mr. Henry James, might have sought a hearing from serious persons in vain for the truth that was in them if the historical novel had not established fiction in the respect of our race as a pleasure which might be enjoyed without self- reproach, or as the sugar of a pill which would be none the less powerful in its effects upon the system because it was agreeable to take. It would be interesting to know, but not very pertinent to inquire, how far our great humorist's use of the historical form in fiction was prompted by love of it, or by an instinctive perception that it was the only form in which he could hope to deliver a message of serious import without being taken altogether in jest. But, at any rate, we can be sure that in each of Mark Twain's attempts of this sort, in the Prince and the Pauper, in the Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court, and in the Personal Recollections of Joan of Arc, he was taken with the imaginative -- that is to say, the true -- nature of his theme, and that he made this the channel of the rich vein of poetry which runs through all his humor and keeps it sound whether it is grotesque or whether it is pathetic in effect. The first of these three books is addressed to children, but it is not children who can get the most out of it; the last is offered to the sympathy and intelligence of men and women, and yet I should not be surprised if it made its deepest and most lasting appeal to the generous heart of youth. But I think that the second will remain the enduring consolation of old and young alike, and will be ranged in this respect and as a masterpiece of humor beside the great work of Cervantes. Since the Ingenious Gentleman of La Mancha there is nothing to compare with the Yankee at the Court of King Arthur, and I shall be very much disappointed in posterity if it does not agree with me. In that colossally amusing scheme, that infinitely suggestive situation, the author was hampered by no such distinct records as he has had to grapple with in his Personal Recollections of Joan of Arc. He could launch himself into a realm of fable and turn it into fact by virtue of his own strong and vivid reality while in a scene whose figures and events are all ascertained by history his fancy has had to work reversely, and transmute the substance into the airy fabric of romance. The result will not be accepted without difficulty by two sorts of critics: the sort who would have had him stick closer to the conventional ideal of the past, as it has been derived from other romancers, and the sort who would have had him throw that altogether away and trust to his own divinations of its life and spirit from the events as set down and